What does it say about how the burden of proof differs in criminal trials and civil trials?

Discussion 04.1| HA4050D-Healthcare Law | National American University

In criminal trials, the burden of proof is higher than in civil trials. In a criminal trial, the prosecutor must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, meaning there can be no lingering doubts about their responsibility for the crime. It requires substantial evidence and testimony, which increases the burden of proof.

In contrast, the burden of proof in civil trials is known as “preponderance of evidence,” which means it only needs to be more likely than not that the accused party was responsible for or caused harm in order for a verdict to be reached. It is easier to win civil cases than criminal ones because the standard of proof is lower. Furthermore, unlike criminal convictions where individuals may face jail time or fines, civil repercussions typically involve an award of damages meant to make up for any losses incurred by the plaintiff as a result of another party’s wrongdoing.

This is a snippet preview, get a complete custom solution
Access a Complete Custom-Written Paper from Our Writers, Now!!