Relativism and situation ethics | Nursing homework help

Relativism refers to the belief that morality does not have an objective, universal standard. Morality is a relative concept. A theory called situation ethics explains that morality is determined by the circumstances in which it occurs. There are no universal moral guidelines that should be applied to all situations. To determine morally right and wrong, situation ethics heavily relies on the individual’s conscience.

Partly, I agree that relativivism and situation ethics have become rampant in today’s society. They can overwhelm those with a strong sense of conscience. These ethical theories may be more common in today’s society. However, they are useful for certain circumstances. In a world that is increasingly multi-cultural, for example, it may be hard to find a set that applies to all people. The concept of relativism is a way to understand and appreciate different values and cultures.

But, relativism and situation ethics are problematic when applied to extremes. It can be difficult to hold people accountable for their actions if there is no standard of morality, particularly in cases where others are being hurt. Furthermore, moral decision-making can be inconsistent and inconsistent if it is based on an individual’s conscience.

Relativism and situation ethics both have advantages and disadvantages. However, I think a balanced approach to the problem is needed. It is important that we recognize individual conscience and acknowledge the necessity for objective moral standards. We also need to be accountable for our actions.

This is a snippet preview, get a complete custom solution
Access a Complete Custom-Written Paper from Our Writers, Now!!