John Stossel says the free market creates more winners than losers. Is it worth having free trade even if some people lose? Do we need restrictions on trade? Why or why not?

John Stossel’s assertion that the free market creates more winners than losers is a valid one, as research has shown that countries with open markets and free trade tend to experience higher levels of economic growth. Free trade is also a way to encourage competition in industries, which could lead to better quality and lower prices.

While it’s true that most people enjoy an open market, there may still be some who are not able to benefit due to foreign imports or increased competition. It is therefore important that governments take steps to provide financial assistance or training for people who are negatively affected by these policies. Some trade restrictions may be required to safeguard vulnerable industries, or stop unfair practices, such as dumping that could harm domestic producers.

Although some trade restrictions might be needed in specific cases, I think the end goal should still be to allow free markets and remove international borders where possible. These would allow nations to benefit from the greatest possible benefits of international commerce, without having to compromise their economic interests.