Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

Yes, there is a difference between “common practice” and “best practice.” Common practice refers to the way things are typically done in a particular setting or situation, while best practice refers to the approach or method that research has shown to be the most effective for achieving a particular outcome. Although common practices can be accepted by many people, research and evidence may differ from what they are. The best practices have proven to improve outcomes, and are based on research.

Part 1: Identification of Research Methodologies

Article 1.

Full Citation: Smith, J. and al. (2018). Study of the impact of nursing education on self-efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 8 (9): 14-22.

This article is why I picked it: It is closely related to the clinical problem that I am interested in, chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD). Study was conducted to evaluate the effects of nursing education on patients suffering from COPD’s self-efficacy. This study has implications for the ethics of research on my clinical topic of interest. It involved human subjects. Informed consent was necessary.

Research Objectives: To determine the effects of nurse-led education upon the self-efficacy and well-being of COPD patients, the purpose of this research was.

Methodology of research: This study used a randomized controlled trial (a quantitative method). Randomly, participants were assigned to one of two groups: an intervention that provided nurse-led education and a control that received regular care. A self-efficacy scale was used to collect data. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and the t-tests.

Strengths in the research methodology Because it measures self-efficacy in a standardized way, the self-efficacy score adds credibility and validity to the study.

Article 2

Full citation: Brown, K. et al. (2019). An exploratory qualitative study to explore the experience of chronic obstructive lung disease patients during hospitalization. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 75 (10): 2311–2319.

The reason I chose to publish this article. It offers a qualitative view of COPD hospitalization experiences, which I believe is an important part of managing this condition. Because it was a human subject study, and informed consent was required, the study has relevance to ethics in research.

The research’s objectives were to investigate the hospitalization experiences of COPD patients.

Methodology of research: This study used a qualitative method, specifically a pragmatic approach. Interviews were conducted using semi-structured interview guides. Participants were recruited at a hospital. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

Strengths in the research methodology It is also a method that rigorously analyzes qualitative data and adds reliability to the validity of the research.

Article 3.

Full citation: Lee, H. et al. (2020). An randomized controlled study to assess the effectiveness of a Telehealth Program for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 10, 103578.

The reason I chose to publish this article The purpose of this study was.

This is a snippet preview, get a complete custom solution
Access a Complete Custom-Written Paper from Our Writers, Now!!