In this assessment, you will evaluate the study according to research design methods, procedures and study results, for example, see Evaluating a Quantitative Study (Houser, 2019, p. 345 & p. 377).

Title: Evaluation of the Effect of a Short Lifestyle Intervention by Generalist Community Nursing Staff

Introduction Harris et. al. conducted a quantitative study to assess the effectiveness of a paper. (2013) titled “The impact of a brief lifestyle intervention delivered by generalist community nurses (CN SNAP trial).” The study evaluated the effectiveness of a brief lifestyle intervention on the health behaviors of patients with high-risk lifestyle behaviors in Australia.

Harris et. al. The study by Harris and colleagues (2013) was a controlled randomized trial. Researchers recruited primary care patients and assigned them randomly to the control or intervention group. While the intervention group was given a lifestyle modification by nurses who are generalists, the control group got regular care. Data were collected from both the baseline and 12-month follow-up.

Harris and colleagues. (2013) used a self-reported questionnaire to collect data on participants’ demographic characteristics, health behaviors, and clinical outcomes. The study also collected data on the intervention’s fidelity, feasibility, and acceptability. Intent-to-treat analysis was used by the researchers to assess whether the intervention had a positive effect on the primary outcome of interest, which was a change in BMI (body mass index).

Harris and colleagues. Harris et al. (2013) discovered that at twelve months, the BMI of the intervention group was significantly lower than the control group. Significant improvements were also seen in the participants’ physical activity and their overall health. This intervention was acceptable and feasible. It was also delivered with high integrity.

Relevance of Harris et. al. The implications of Harris et al. (2013) have significant implications for nursing practice. A brief lifestyle intervention by community nurses can improve patients’ health. This is the result of the study. The evidence is useful for nurses who want to use it to help improve their patient’s health.

Limitations Harris and colleagues. Limitations The study by Harris et al. (2013) is not without its limitations. Self-reported data was used in the study, but this is susceptible to recall biases and social desirability bias. It also has a short 12-month follow-up, so the long-term efficacy of the intervention remains unknown.

Harris et. al. concluded that the Harris study was a valuable source of evidence. Harris et al. (2013) provide valuable evidence about the efficacy of lifestyle interventions delivered by generalist nurses to improve the health behavior of high-risk patients. The study’s findings have significant implications for nursing practice and suggest that nurses can play a crucial role in improving their patients’ health outcomes.

Bibliography

Harris, M. F., Chan, B. C., Laws, R. A., Williams, A. M., Davies, G. P., Jayasinghe, U. W., … Milat, A. (2013). Study of the impact on lifestyle changes made by generalist nurses in the community (CN SNAP). BMC Public Health 13(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-375

Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Readings, using & creating evidence (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Astroth, K. S., & Chung, S. Y. (2018). Focusing on the basics: Quantitative research should be read with an open mind. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 45(3), 283-287.

This is a snippet preview, get a complete custom solution
Access a Complete Custom-Written Paper from Our Writers, Now!!